Microsoft in the Weeds

Nathaniel Popper for the new York Times: 

"But Microsoft is breaking the corporate taboo on pot this week by announcing a partnership to begin offering software that tracks marijuana plants from “seed to sale,” as the pot industry puts it.

The software — a new product in Microsoft’s cloud computing business — is meant to help states that have legalized the medical or recreational use of marijuana keep tabs on sales and commerce, ensuring that they remain in the daylight of legality."

Between LinkedIn and this, Nadella is forging ahead by noticing new, different and exciting opportunities for Microsoft. 

Court Backs Rules Treating Internet as Utility, Not Luxury

An important example of when it's important to maintain the status quo. still, while this is definitely a desired outcome in the view of the public interest, this won't be settled until it's been looked at by the Supreme Court.

Cecilia Kang of The New York Times wrote a great article about this and their video (below) is exceptionally informative.

The Death of the Period.

An interesting take on how technology is changing the way we communicate. As Dan Bilefsky writes for the NYTimes, I find myself taking on that "get off my lawn" feeling when it comes to the apparent lost of the period. Things like apps within messaging apps (#8) aren't helping.

It's not made any easier by the fact that his piece doesn't use periods. 

"Professor Crystal’s observations on the fate of the period are driven in part by frequent visits to high schools across Britain, where he analyzes students’ text messages

Researchers at Binghamton University in New York and Rutgers University in New Jersey have also recently noted the period’s new semantic force

They asked 126 undergraduate students to review 16 exchanges, some in text messages, some in handwritten notes, that had one-word affirmative responses (Okay, Sure, Yeah, Yup) Some had periods, while others did not

Those text message with periods were rated as less sincere, the study found, whereas it made no difference in the notes penned by hand"

10 #WWDC2016 Keynote Innovations that were Long Overdue

The first thing to say is that I wasn't blown away.

  1. OS X is now macOS.
    • Hasn't it been "Mac OS X" from the start in 2001? It's always been a little bizarre how Apple chose to call the system "OS (10)" for more than a decade while iOS would be renamed with intuitive numbering since its inception in 2007. This change is long overdue.
       
  2. Siri is open to Developers for deep integration into apps
    • Siri debuted on the iPhone 4S in 2011 w/ iOS 5. The team that developed Siri got frustrated with Apple's lackluster approach to the software and left to start their own system called Viv. In the meantime Amazon pioneered a new generation of dedicated voice interface devices and Google also got on the train, leveraging their deep understanding of natural language interactions.  I know it takes time to build proper developer tools for these systems but this is, again, long overdue.
       
  3. Siri is on the Mac
    • There is one exciting thing here, and that's the ability for Siri to help find and manage files on your desktop. iOS doesn't really have a file system, so considerable thought and work must have been done in order to achieve this. kudos.
       
    • Still, given that the software was made to work with a teeny-tiny little phone, with far less computing power than Apple's powerful desktops, I'm not sure what technical barriers stood in the way of this revolutionary achievement but it was (say it with me) long overdue.
       
  4. Copy and Paste across devices.
    • Pastebot has been doing this for years over wifi networks, so this feels less magical to me than it perhaps does to others. While I hate to see an app's functionality (and business) get swallowed up by the OS it's on, Apple can bring background AirDrop services to bear as well as cellular networks into the mix alongside their cloud computing to make copy and paste work across devices anywhere they may be, which is a good thing. Given PasteBot's work in this space more than four years ago, this functionality feels overdue.
       
  5. Apple Pay works on the Mac
    • The premise is welcome and makes sense but the functionality does not. The idea that if I want to use Apple Pay on my desktop, I have to go and find my phone to authenticate via my fingerprint, is the definition of awkward. I get that WWDC is a software conference but the Mac needs a TouchID fingerprint scanner. It shouldnt be too difficult to incorporate it into the trackpad because hopping back and forth between devices is a barrier to impulsive commerce. Especially if your phone is in another room, or worse yet, your kid is playing with it.
       
  6. Apple Pay works on the Web
    • Apple Pay, which was really the ingenious merging of TouchID+NFC to securely authenticate transactions, is a fantastic use of available technologies to make life easier and through that ease, facilitate more commerce. This is a natural evolution of the technology but I could have sworn I saw a demo of Apple Pay being used on the Target website back when it was announced but perhaps that was just the app. Either way, I'm not the only one who thinks this functionality was long awaited (aka overdue).
       
  7. Apple Watch OS 3.0
    • The good news? This may be the first embedded device by Apple that actually moves more quickly with new OS updates, unlike the sluggishness that users often complain about after updating iOS.
      Remember that #iPhoneSlow is not on purpose.

      Apple Watch has been on the market a little over a year now and it's already on the third version of it's OS. Given the "year-in-review" takes I read on the wearable device, I remain of the opinion that the watch was launched prematurely because the tech wasn't there in the first place. At first, this was limted to thinking about the device's hardware-- chiefly laggy touch response and animations alongside poor battery life. The fact that Apple is launching not just point-releases but whole new versions of the OS effectively once a trimester, shows that the software wasn't there either. There are some gems in Watch OS 3 but certain key bits of functionality like sharing fitness metrics and scribbling words with a finger should have been present at launch and are long overdue.
       
  8. iOS Messages Have Apps!
    • Messages are becoming more fun. A lot of people won't care about this but, conversely, a LOT of people will. Opening up Messages to developers is a solid move toward making communication more vibrant and finding news ways of expression. Emoji and other image-based communications also mean that people will be able to say more (albeit silly) things to one another across traditional language barriers. As regular, small snippets of communication are less and less about the written word, one wonders will happen to grammar and usage in the West, but (a) it'll certainly be interesting and (b) only time will tell.

      There are two pieces here. Apple has created an app SDK for devs to create new ways for users to communicate on messaging and they've added some of their own flash and bang to the messaging experience. C'est la vie.
       
  9. Apple News gets subscriptions and push notifications
    • To date, Apple News, which is basically a web browser with links to news stories based on topics the users has said they're interested in, has been an interesting experience. It's been informative without being immersive-- and that's a good thing. Get some news, nicely curated, and then get out and do something. With subscriptions, however, I wonder if the software will be reminiscent of it's awful predecessor, NewsStand, which was an app replete with paywalls and content updates and that felt heavy because of it. I don't see myself using News anymore if I'm challenged with a call to subscribe every time I open a story on a nationally renowned site. Apple is usually good about this sort of thing. Time will tell.

      As for notifications of breaking news.. the system has long known my preferences so this should have been offered at launch so this is somewhat overdue.
       
  10. Photos use AI for a better experience
    • Everpix started this functionality back in 2011. Everpix ultimately failed (their product was superior but their business model required a $50/year subscription, which was ahead of it's time. Figuring out how to store, screen, read, organize and otherwise process these images is tricky-- no downright difficult. Was Apple behind Google and the defunct Everpix in offering this functionality? Sure. But given the challenges of getting it right, I can't in good conscience say that this feature is overdue. It's the ability to retroactively tag and organize photos that's interesting. I look forward to seeing how this works on the images imported into Photos on the Mac. This could be right on time.
       
  11. Voicemail gets transcription.
    • Visual voicemail was an incredible innovation in 2007 when the iPhone came out. Google added transcription to their iOS app, Google Voice, in 2009-- seven years ago. The feature was helpful because it allowed the consuming of voicemail discreetly during meetings or quietly in bed while your partner is deep in slumber. Say it with me now:

      Long overdue!

German Automakers Aggressively Moving Forward with EV plans

Jason Graul of Business Finance News is reports that Germany's Big Three automakers (BMW, Daimler, and VolksWagen) are beginning to ramp up their EV product goals. It's a strange concession from an industry that, less than a decade ago, thought EVs were impossible. The reason for this renewed interest in electronic vehicles?

US Automaker Tesla Motors

"Even though for Tesla, Germany has remained a low-volume market, for the German automakers, US has proved to be the key auto market. Recently, Tesla garnered overwhelming response for its latest mass-market Model 3, which indicates how much electric vehicles are being preferred by the people if they were offered at lower prices. The US electric car maker also revealed a new goal of producing half a million cars per year in 2018 — two years ahead of its actual planned date of 2020. This is reflective of the fact that the company is aggressively moving ahead with its EV plans and hence, other automakers need to ramp up their operations if they are to compete with Tesla."

Dieselgate: Korea

It's our nature to move forward and leave the past in the past. Still, it's important to realise that Dieselgate is still here, and that while the US EPA discovered the scandal, the US isn't the only nation affected by it.

Some highlights:

Prosecutors also recently confiscated 956 vehicles of Audi Volkswagen Korea from its pre-delivery inspection center in Pyeongtaek, Gyeonggi Province, and said 606 of them had been imported without proper environmental authorization.
The legal action came a few days after prosecutors said last week that Volkswagen Audi Korea allegedly submitted 37 doctored reports of the vehicles’ emissions results and noise levels from 2010 to 2015.
Meanwhile, the environment ministry here last week rejected Volkswagen’s plan to recall its vehicles with fabricated emissions results, saying the local unit of the German carmaker did not admit to using a defeat device to trick vehicle testing.

The ministry rejected two previous recall plans in January and March for insufficient data and the lack of a proper outline to rectify the shortcomings of the vehicles affected.
— -Korea Times.

It's incredible that the facts are still yet to be uncovered in this matter because of the sheer scale of the deception, which appears to have been perpetrated by the VW management worldwide.

You can read the full Korea Times story here.
 

 

MS Acquires LinkedIN for $26,000,000,000.00

That's right, Microsoft ("MS") seems to have picked up $26 billion dollars.

Why? Well, aside from Cramer's musings about "cloud strategy" LinkedIN, a silicon valley based social network, focused on building and maintaining business relationships, and has a few key features that can help the Redmond technology giant:

  • Unlike Facebook and Twitter, LinkedIN has paying users rather than relying solely on advertisers.
  • A base of users which are constantly sharing information about what makes them money
  • An ungodly amount of data on businesses eager to share information on how they succeed
  • A human resources recruiting tool that allows them the inside track on talent like none-other.

It occurs to me that by using MS's Cloud services, mining LinkedIN data can lead MS to the inside track on innovative and even disruptive emerging companies. This would allow their strategy teams to identify opportunities for (1) lucrative partnerships and (2) promising investments. Despite the incredible cost of this acquisition,** such actions can lead MS to some very lucrative VC and strategic partnership concerns in the future, and that's very, very exciting. 

MS has had some mixed success with recent, large acquisitions. While Skype (2011 for $8.5 billion) seems to be doing fine, Nokia (2013 for $7.2 billion) turned into a disaster, as did their earlier attempt at mobile, Danger (2008 for $1/2 billion). In the online ad services game, which LinkedIN ties to, MS has had pretty poor success. Their earlier push for a presence in this market took the form of a 2007, $6.3 billion acquisition of aQuantive, the parent company of digital ad agency Razorfish owned by Publicis Group and Atlas Solutions, an adserver now owned by Facebook. MS wasn't able to make the subsidiary work and took a $6.2 billion write down of the acquisition in 2007 before selling the pieces off to the above-mentioned companies.

The LinkedIN acquisition also allows something else-- an ability for MS to expand it's deterministic unique identifiers of online activity. While LinkedIN will remain independent for now, MS will certainly add the user data to its existing Microsoft Account user interaction data and perhaps eventually combine the two, following users from recreational activities like gaming on Xbox and home video streaming, to their workplace activities like using LinkedIN and MS office. This means less tracking by less accurate, probalistic tracking identifiers like browser cookies, wifi netowrks, IP address tracking.

We'll be watching this closely.

**looks like $2+ billion over the current LinkedIN market cap of $24+ billion.

The Drill Down 429: Big Red Button

This week, yours truly is back from China to discuss how the FBI wants to spy on your Internet history (without a warrant), how Snapchat beats Twitter, and how Facebook’s CEO got hacked. We also discuss a way to stop evil artificial intelligence from taking over the world, and the story of a machine that saw, analysed, and remembered the iconic film, Blade Runner. 
It's a little weird.

Find the episode on Geeks of Doom.

The Tesla Model X - A Lifestyle Take

Whereupon Bloomberg's Hannah Elliott takes a road trip in a $150,000.00 Model X through super-charger rich California and produces a video assessment of the vehicle with a duration of less than three and a half minutes.

Elliott's video review is posted below from YouTube. The conclusions are that the car feels virtuous but it's cost isn't the money, but the time-sucking lifestyle of an electric auto's charging requirements and the lack of "mechanical" nature of the drive.

I genuinely appreciate the lifestyle discussion from Elliott due to her funky personal fashion taste and the casual but caring but also matter-of-fact tone she uses, but when you put it all together it doesn't ring with sincerity. She scratches the surface of lifestyle, states that doors open unexpectedly without any real visual evidence, and forgets that a single-gear dual motor drive train is about as direct as once gets when it comes to the mechanics of a car-- especially when one compares that to the Triptronics and paddle shiftiness of modern, conventionally powered sport luxury vehicles. 

When it comes to complaints about range, the crossover segment, perhaps more than any other auto segment, is designed for the daily errands and the weekend warrior-- both well within the battery range of the top-end model Elliott evaluated-- and that's in Colorado, where mountain climbs are steeper (I-70) than CA and Superchargers are bit more rare.

Then there's the ample time that the (very short) evaluation spends on waiting for the Model X to charge up at the super charging station. The editing makes the charging seem disproportionately long compared to the balance of her five day trip along the CA coast. Time that could be spent discussing the intimate details of any connection she has with the vehicle are spend bouncing a ball in a corner or talking on the phone...which she does on the handset while sitting in the car rather than showing us how well the bluetooth hands-free works.

I'm disappointed. Elliott could have done a lot more in the time she had.

The Drill Down 428: 10-Core Workout

This week, while I was in China, Andrew and Tosin were on their own to discuss why the Jawbone UP is down and out, how and why Intel is busting out 10-core chips, and whether the Hulk Hogan/Gawker suit threaten journalistic free speech? They also get into whether the Google vs Oracle matter is a victory for fair use, and how European hate speech laws may affect US social media.

Find the episode over at Geeks of Doom.

The Drill Down 427: Peter Thiel, We ♥ You (Don’t Sue)!

While I was in China, Andrew and Tosin connected with Greg Davies of TARDISBlend podcast fame, to discuss Uber's ambition for autonomous cars, how Twitter plans to let you tweet longer, Google’s modular phone Project Ara, and they ask whether Apple become the next Blackberry.
Also-- in the episode: are crime algorithms racist? And why you shouldn’t piss off Peter Thiel...

Find the episode on Geeks of Doom.

The Drill Down 426: Fix Yo’ Sh*t

On this week’s Drill Down podcast, , Andrew, Tosin and yours truly discuss the end of the free ride for Windows 10, shady trending news reporting at Facebook, how Amazon plans to challenge YouTube, a new intelligent assistant from the mind behind Siri, and we wonder about disturbing reports that say Apple Music can wipe out your song collection.

Find the episode at Geeks of Doom.

Amazon - The Everything Store. And Bezos means EVERYTHING

The last several months have been big for Amazon. Most recently, the so-called "Everything Store" posted a profit; a feat considered by most analysts to be above and beyond expectations.  The Echo device has been a breakout hit that's selling like hotcakes. Now they've hit phase II, with Echo Skills that allow for third parties to pair their services to the voice services. 

To that end, Ford, Uber, and Dominoes have decided to partner with the retail giant to grow their sales, meaning that through an Amazon portal, you can order a ride or a pizza with your voice, or, in the case of Ford, one day soon you'll be able to access Alexa Voice Services in your car in order to ask queries, get the news, and put things on your to-do and shopping lists.

As if totally leapfrogging the intelligent voice assistants that Apple and Google slapped onto their mobile devices wasn't enough, Amazon 

One Year On, the Apple Watch Is in Need of a New Direction

Nilay Patel, writing for The Verge:

"I look at the Apple Watch and it's so obviously underpowered. We can sit around and argue about whether speeds and feeds matter, but the grand ambition of the Apple Watch is to be a full-fledged computer on your wrist, and right now it's a very slow computer. If Apple believes the Watch is indeed destined to become that computer, it needs to radically increase the raw power of the Watch's processor, while maintaining its just-almost-acceptable battery life. And it needs to do that while all of the other computers around us keep getting faster themselves."

I agree with him completely. But his argument is not impervious to critiques. As a close friend pointed out, the watch will get faster. Apple's moves to Watch OS 2 and native apps has helped immensely. And it's "a given" that future generations of the device will move more quickly.

But when I look at those truths, I remain unsatisfied. Patel's point is, in essence, that the watch was premature because the tech wasn't there in the first place. 

It's slow and has barely OK battery life from his (a quite a few others') perspective. When you think deeply and critically about those drawbacks, you realise that Apple compromised on performance in order to get the thing to last through the day, and that compromise lead to a poor experience-- consistently labelled as "laggy" -- from Day One. That's the opposite of what we expect from Apple.

My 120mhz Pebble Classic does a lot less than the Apple Watch to be sure, but the interface remains snappy after myriad of software updates and the battery still lasts for days on end. Those attributes are ones that I consider more "Apple-y" than the experience that I felt when I owned the watch for a couple of days before returning it; and that Patel has concluded over the course of a year of usage. 

When Apple lover and analyst John Gruber says he hopes Apple can "take a step back and reconsider some of the fundamental aspects to the *conceptual design,*" he's sugarcoating nothing less than severe dissatisfaction with the product and signalling that the iPhone+Wrist paradigm, with its gestures, buttons and swipes, and mostly-off screen doesn't make for a compelling device. When you combine his take and Patel's it sounds like they would hope that Apple chooses to make the watch less of a computer on the wrist, and more native to a watch experience- because this thing isn't working. 

This is not just an Apple problem. Google-based watches suffer from the same soup of technical yuck. The fact that purpose built, fitness trackers are still a thing rather than being sidelined by last year's touch-screen wonder watches means that if Apple and others want to attract people with their take on this new category, they need to offer truly snappy interfaces (read: quick), along with long enough battery life so that users don't really think twice about it. Charge it every night, sure, but build it so an active person gets an perceptually unlimited amount of use from the thing during the day. Additionally it's got to feel durable enough for users to really not worry about scratches to glass  and anodised paint, and yet retain whatever stylistic grace it's come to hold. And if it can't do these things, and do them soon, it needs to get cheaper. 

Especially when they at Apple's leadership claim such devices have a lifetime of only three years.

Meet the Tech Firm that's Gonna Make a KILLING Off Of Zika

Today the CDC confirmed that the Zika virus, which is carried by the A. Aegypti mosquito, is responsible for thousands of birth defects in children. On top of that, public health officials are worried about other health affects of Zika, that could hurt not only humans in-vitro, but post-natal babies and adults. 

As per usual in our technified and super-scientific age, cue the solution. That same A. Aegypti mosquito has been studied for some time due to the fact that it's responsible for transmitting both Malaria and Dengue fever. With such fatal diseases associated with it the medical, technology, and general scientific communities have given it a lot of attention. So much so that

  1. The Gates foundation has funded the mapping of the mosquito's genome
  2. UC Irvine has developed mosquitoes with strong immune systems that defeat the parasites that cause these debilitating and fatal diseases.
  3. The Center for Infection Disease Dynamics has developed a fungus that kills mosquitoes before parasites have enough time to turn the little insects into viable hosts

You can imagine the amounts of cash that those three efforts took. But there's one that'll trump them all. About two years ago, in late March of 2014, NPR's RadioLab radio-show and podcast produced an episode called "Kill 'em All." In it, they spoke with a British-based lab called Oxitec. If ever there were an evil dystopian name to call your company, there you go. Oxitec's solution to the mosquito problem stands out from the others in that it's both radical in its manipulation of the insect and jaw dropping in its effects. 

The company maintains biological farms or factories wherein they breed the doomsday mosquitoes A. Aegypti-- but their recipe for mosquito farming includes tweaking the bug just a little bit. Oxitec manipulates the DNA of A. Aegypti so that the males (which don't bite people to begin with) carry a special gene. This gene has no affect on the males, so when Oxitec releases these guys into the wild in vast numbers, the females are happy to mate with them. What happens next is the key.

Baby mosquitoes born of the Oxitec males are hindered by the gene. The gene hinders all of the males' offspring so that they don't survive until maturity-- effectively killing off the population of mosquitoes in the area by wiping out an entire generation.

Oddly enough this is tactic - wiping out a generation-- is what scares so many people about Zika.

So what are the consequences of this Dr. Frankenstein-type of science? There's not much debate about it actually. NPR reported earlier this year that both Rutgers and Penn State entomology professors were fine taking out the bug. 

"If we took out Aedes aegypti, that would be something," [Andrew Reade of Penn State] adds. "Nothing good comes from them, just that people get really sick."

[Rutgers entomology professor Dina Fonseca] feels similarly. "I'm not worried about eradicating an invasive mosquito. It's an urban species that specializes on feeding on people," she says. "The result of removing them is health to humans and more people."

Still, one man's trash is another man's treasure. It's clear that the same qualities that make mosquitoes like A. Aegypti so abhorrent to mankind actually do jungles and rain forests like the Amazon an important service by making sure people don't regularly settle there, which would significantly add to the problem of global deforestation. By being at once annoying, painful and in the case of Zika, Dengue and Malaria, dangerous pests, mosquitoes help the Amazon, which has been called "The Lungs of the Earth," due to its role in generating the oxygen most life on the planet, from being easily reduced to ashes for the sake of condos, corporate head quarters or resorts. If the Amazon goes, we may all go soon thereafter. 

That said, it's pretty clear that solutions like the one Oxitec and other firms like it have proposed is a clear winner for human-populated areas that don't have much reason to appreciate mosquitoes like the Southern US, Europe, and some of the smaller Caribbean islands. 

It might be time to think about buying some stock in Oxitec, or its parent company, Intrexon Corporation**, which picked up the mosquito start up for a cool $160 million in the summer of 2015.

 

**These biotech guys are great at choosing horrifying and ominously cold names for their companies.